Book Review
Book Review of Yao Huang, Renyuan Li et al., Sovereignty and Maritime Rights in the South China Sea: A Jurisprudential Study
Yinan Bao 1,*
1 Huayang Center for Maritime Cooperation and Ocean Governance, 570100 Haikou, China
* Correspondence: baoyinan@hyyj.org.cn
Academic Editors: Yongming Jin; Dan Liu
https://doi.org/10.59711/jims.11.110012
References
1. Li, R. Research on the Historic Rights in International Law; Law Press China: Beijing, China, 2018; ISBN 978-7-5197-2108-4. [Google Scholar]
2. Huang, Y.; Huang, J. The South China Sea Arbitration: A Jurisprudential Study of Core Issues; Joint Publishing: Hongkong, 2018; ISBN 978-962-04-3522-5. [Google Scholar]
3. PCA. The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China) Available online: https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/7/ (accessed on 15 June 2024).
4. Chinese Society of International Law. The South China Sea Arbitration Awards: A Critical Study. Chin. J. Int. Law 2018, 17, 207–748, doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmy012. [Crossref]
5. Yee, S. The South China Sea Arbitration (The Philippines v. China): Potential Jurisdictional Obstacles or Objections. Chin. J. Int. Law 2014, 13, 663–739, doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmu045. [Crossref]
6. Gao, Z.; Jia, B.B. The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications. Am. J. Int. Law 2013, 107, 98–123, doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0098. [Crossref]
7. Zou, K.; Liu, X. The Legal Status of the U-Shaped Line in the South China Sea and Its Legal Implications for Sovereignty, Sovereign Rights and Maritime Jurisdiction. Chin. J. Int. Law 2015, 14, 57–77, doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmv008. [Crossref]
8. Hamid, A.G. The Principle That the Land Dominates the Sea in the Context of South China Sea Disputes: A Critical Appraisal. IIUM Law J. 2022, 30, 49–75, doi:10.31436/iiumlj.v30i2.742. [Crossref]
9. Jennings, R.Y. The Acquisition of Territory in International Law With a New Introduction by Marcelo G. Kohen; Manchester University Press: Manchester, 2017; ISBN 978-1-5261-8391-0. [Crossref]
10. Su, J. The Unity Status of Continental States’ Outlying Archipelagos. Int. J. Mar. Coast. Law 2020, 35, 801–833, doi:10.1163/15718085-BJA10004. [Crossref]
11. Zhang, H. The Legality of China’s Application of Straight Baselines in Mid-Ocean Archipelagos: New Perspectives from Customary International Law. Foreign Aff. Rev. 2014, 31, 129–143, doi:10.13569/j.cnki.far.2014.02.129. [Google Scholar]
12. Ma, X. China and the UNCLOS: Practices and Policies. Chin. J. Glob. Gov. 2019, 5, 1–20, doi:10.1163/23525207-12340036. [Crossref]
13. Samuels, M.S. Contest for the South China Sea; Routledge: London, 2005; ISBN 978-1-315-01890-4. [Google Scholar]
14. Hayton, B. The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia; Yale University Press: New Haven, 2014; ISBN 978-0-300-18954-4. [Crossref]
15. Talmon, S. The South China Sea Arbitration: Jurisdiction, Admissibility, Procedure; Publications on ocean development; Brill Nijhoff: Leiden Boston, 2022; ISBN 978-90-04-38119-3. [Crossref]
16. Tanaka, Y. The South China Sea Arbitration: Toward an International Legal Order in the Oceans; Hart Publishing: Oxford; New York, 2019; ISBN 978-1-5099-2481-3. [Google Scholar]
17. Yang, C. Jurisprudence Research on the Sovereignty over the Nansha Islands; Nanjing University Press: Nanjing, 2018; ISBN 978-7-305-21313-7.[Google Scholar]
18. Wu, S. Origin and Development of Nansha Disputes; Beijing, 2022; ISBN 978-7-101-15560-0. [Google Scholar]
19. Hayton, B. When Good Lawyers Write Bad History: Unreliable Evidence and the South China Sea Territorial Dispute. Ocean Dev. Int. Law 2017, 48, 17–34, doi:10.1080/00908320.2017.1265362. [Crossref]
20. Chen, H. Republic of China’s Decision‐Making Process in Regards to Drawing a U‐shaped Line on the Map of the South China Sea and Its Implications. Pac. Focus 2016, 31, 283–306, doi:10.1111/pafo.12074. [Crossref]