Communication
China’s Road-map for Regional Cooperation: Building a Community of Shared Future in the South China Sea
Yuquan Zhang1,2,3,*,You Li1
1 School of International Relations, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
2 Center for Philippines Studies, Institute of Southeast Asia, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
3 Center for American Studies, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
* Correspondence: gmszyq@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Academic Editors: Xiaohong Wan; Xiaodi Ye; Peng Jiang; Fangyin Zhou
Abstract: The South China Sea (SCS) has long been mired in historical disputes and rising geopolitical tensions, making innovative frameworks necessary to foster regional stability. This article introduces the Community of Shared Future (CSF), China’s strategic roadmap to transform the SCS from a contested space into a zone of cooperation. Rooted in mutual benefit and multilateralism, the CSF emphasizes joint resource management, economic integration, and conflict de-escalation. Deep-rooted issues, such as colonial legacies, resource competition, and contests between nations, have exacerbated regional disputes. Furthermore, post-2016 militarization by claimants has hindered resolution efforts. The CSF counters zero-sum logics by prioritizing shared interests, such as temporarily suspending sovereignty claims, promoting joint fisheries and energy ventures, and embedding cooperative norms in ASEAN dialogues. A key component of this vision is leveraging China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to promote infrastructure development, marine conservation, and tourism. Indonesia’s pragmatic approach to balancing sovereignty and economic cooperation offers a model for other littoral states. However, obstacles remain, including persistent distrust among ASEAN members and external interference. The success of the CSF is contingent upon the implementation of a multifaceted, interconnected framework by policymakers. This implementation must encompass the following five pillars: (1) the facilitation of diplomatic consensus-building through bilateral and ASEAN dialogues, (2) the promotion of economic integration via revenue-sharing and BRI-backed projects, (3) the coordination of security measures to mitigate militarization, (4) the enhancement of legal and diplomatic frameworks, and (5) the establishment of a new maritime security forum or secretariat for the SCS. By conceptualizing the SCS as a “common home” rather than a site of conflict, the CSF aligns with ASEAN’s developmental agenda while accommodating China’s strategic imperatives. This approach ultimately positions the SCS as a potential exemplar for global maritime governance probably.
Keywords: South China Sea; Community of Shared Future; ASEAN; Belt and Road Initiative; dispute resolution; China
https://doi.org/10.59711/jims.12.110022
References
1. Lema, K. Philippines to Pick Venue Soon for Second South China Sea Case against Beijing Available online: https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-pick-venue-soon-second-south-china-sea-case-against-beijing-2025-01-23/ (accessed on 12 March 2025).
2. Chen, A. South China Sea: Vietnam’s Growing Spratly Outposts Spark Flashpoint Concern in China Available online: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3283834/south-china-sea-vietnams-growing-spratly-outposts-spark-flashpoint-concern-china (accessed on 12 March 2025).
3. Judson, J. US Army Deploys Midrange Missile for First Time in Philippines Available online: https://www.defensenews.com/land/2024/04/16/us-army-deploys-midrange-missile-for-first-time-in-philippines/ (accessed on 12 March 2025).
4. Entering Uncharted Waters? ASEAN and the South China Sea; Pavin, C., Ed.; Institute of Southeast Asian Studies: Singapore, 2014; ISBN 978-981-4380-26-3. [Google Scholar]
5. Raine, S. Regional Disorder: The South China Sea Disputes; 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; ISBN 978-1-351-22406-2. [Google Scholar]
6. Southgate, L. ASEAN Resistance to Sovereignty Violation: Interests, Balancing and the Role of the Vanguard State; Bristol University Press: Bristol, UK, 2019; ISBN 978-1-5292-0221-2. [Google Scholar]
7. Matthews, W. Trump’s Ambiguous Stance on China Raises the Risk of Accidental Conflict in the Indo-Pacific Available online: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/01/trumps-ambiguous-stance-china-raises-risk-accidental-conflict-indo-pacific (accessed on 12 March 2025).
8. Li, J.M.; Zhang, W.Z.; Liu, S.H.; Luo, Y. Dataset of the South China Sea U-Boundary and the Geographical Names for Part of the Nanhai Zhudao. J. Glob. Change Data Discov. 2022, 6, 118–124, doi:10.3974/geodp.2022.01.16. [Crossref]
9. Shaughnessy, E.L. Unearthed Documents and the Question of the Oral versus Written Nature of the Classic of Poetry. Harv. J. Asiat. Stud. 2015, 75, 331–375, doi:10.1353/jas.2015.0022. [Crossref]
10. Gao, Z.; Jia, B.B. The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications. Am. J. Int. Law 2013, 107, 98–123, doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0098. [Crossref]
11. Bao, Y. Book Review of Yao Huang, Renyuan Li et al., Sovereignty and Maritime Rights in the South China Sea: A Jurisprudential Study. J. Isl. Mar. Stud. 2024, 2, 110012, doi:10.59711/jims.11.110012. [Crossref]
12. Carty, A. The History and Sovereignty of the South China Sea Islands; 1st ed.; New Star Press: Beijing, China, 2024; ISBN 978-7-5133-5527-8. [Google Scholar]
13. Chen, Q. The Nationalist Government’s Efforts to Recover Chinese Sovereignty over the Islands in the South China Sea after the End of World War Two. J. Mod. Chin. Hist. 2017, 11, 72–96, doi:10.1080/17535654.2017.1313527. [Crossref]
14. Li, G. The United States Government’s Deliberations and Actions on the Status of the South China Sea Islands, 1943–1951: The Formation of American Policy towards South China Sea Disputes. J. Mod. Chin. Hist. 2017, 11, 97–111, doi:10.1080/17535654.2017.1314659. [Crossref]
15. Deng, Y.; Jiang, D. The Cairo Declaration as an Ideological Aspiration: A Response to the Changes in the Behavior of the United States towards China and Japan against the Backdrop of the China-Japan Islands Dispute. J. Zhejiang Ocean Univ. Sci. 32, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
16. Schwartz, T.; Yoo, J. Asian Territorial Disputes and the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty: The Case of Dokdo. Chin. J. Int. Law 2019, 18, 503–550, doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmz017. [Crossref]
17. The South China Sea Disputes: Historical, Geopolitical and Legal Studies; Hsieh, T.-S., Ed.; Series on contemporary China; World Scientific: New Jersey, 2018; ISBN 978-981-323-488-8. [Google Scholar]
18. Wu, S. The Origins, Development, and Evolution of the South China Sea Issue Available online: https://mkszyxy.sicau.edu.cn/info/1139/2675.htm (accessed on 13 March 2025).
19. Gipouloux, F. The Asian Mediterranean: Port Cities and Trading Networks in China, Japan and South Asia, 13th-21st Century; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-0-85793-427-7. [Google Scholar]
20. Xie, X.; Tang, W.; Zhang, G.; Zhao, Z.; Song, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Guo, J. The Gradual Subduction-Collision Evolution Model of Proto-South China Sea and Its Control on Oil and Gas. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2023, 42, 123–137, doi:10.1007/s13131-022-2132-z. [Crossref]
21. Katili, J.A. Geology of Southeast Asia with Particular Reference to the South China Sea. In The South China Sea; Elsevier, 1981; pp. 1077–1091 ISBN 978-0-08-028692-1. [Google Scholar]
22. Du Bois, E.P. Review of Principal Hydrocarbon-Bearing Basins of the South China Sea Area. Energy 1981, 6, 1113–1140, doi:10.1016/0360-5442(81)90029-3. [Crossref]
23. Zhao, X. In Pursuit of a Community of Shared Future: China’s Global Activism in Perspective. China Q. Int. Strateg. Stud. 2018, 04, 23–37, doi:10.1142/S2377740018500082. [Crossref]
24. Nathan, A.J.; Zhang, B. ‘A Shared Future for Mankind’: Rhetoric and Reality in Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping. J. Contemp. China 2022, 31, 57–71, doi:10.1080/10670564.2021.1926091. [Crossref]
25. China and the Indo-Pacific: Maneuvers and Manifestations; Singh, S., Marwah, R., Eds.; Palgrave Series in Asia and Pacific Studies; Palgrave Macmillan: Singapore, 2023; ISBN 978-981-19752-0-2. [Google Scholar]
26. Casciaro, T.; Piskorski, M.J. Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory. Adm. Sci. Q. 2005, 50, 167–199, doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.167. [Crossref]
27. Gill-Tiney, P. A Liberal Peace?: The Growth of Liberal Norms and the Decline of Interstate Violence. J. Confl. Resolut. 2022, 66, 413–442, doi:10.1177/00220027211035554. [Crossref]
28. Dettmer, H.W. The Conflict Resolution Diagram: Creating Win-Win Solutions. Qual. Prog. 1999, 32, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
29. Chinese Mission to ASEAN Keynote Speech by Chinese Ambassador to ASEAN Hou Yanqi at the ASEAN-China Forum 2024 Available online: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/zwbd/202412/t20241218_11500970.html (accessed on 12 April 2025).
30. Wang, S.; Xue, X.; Zhu, A.; Ge, Y. The Key Driving Forces for Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2363, doi:10.3390/su9122363. [Crossref]
31. Rosamond, B. Theories of European Integration; The European Union Series; Palgrave Publishers, 2000; ISBN 0-333-64716-5. [Google Scholar]
32. Verdun, A. Economic and Political Theories of Integration. In European Responses to Globalization and Financial Market Integration; Palgrave Macmillan UK: London, 2000; pp. 17–47 ISBN 978-1-4039-0059-3. [Google Scholar]
33. Kardon, I.B. China’s Law of the Sea: The New Rules of Maritime Order; Yale University Press: New Haven, 2023; ISBN 978-0-300-25647-5. [Google Scholar]
34. Li, H.; Chen, X. Book Review of Isaac B. Kardon, China’s Law of the Sea: The New Rules of Maritime Order. J. Isl. Mar. Stud. 2024, 2, 110008, doi:10.59711/jims.11.110008. [Crossref]
35. Hu, S. Tan Sri ONG Tee Keat: China and ASEAN’s Bilateral Trade Will Achieve a Qualitative Leap Available online: https://m.21jingji.com/article/20250708/herald/46603760cc30138615e87b753befda7f.html (accessed on 10 July 2025).
36. Paszak, P. China and the “Malacca Dilemma” Available online: https://warsawinstitute.org/china-malacca-dilemma/ (accessed on 15 April 2025).
37. Zou, Y. China and Indonesia’s Responses to Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea: Forming a Tacit Understanding on Security. Mar. Policy 2023, 149, 105502, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105502. [Crossref]
38. Haldar, S.; Sharma, A. Squad and the Rise of Minilateralism in the Indo-Pacific Available online: https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/squad-and-the-rise-of-minilateralism-in-the-indo-pacific (accessed on 30 March 2025).
39. Seah, S.; Ha, H.T.; Martinus, M.; Thao, P.T.P. The State of Southeast Asia: 2021 Survey Report; ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute: Singapore, 2021; ISBN 27375110. [Google Scholar]
40. Seah, S.; Lin, J.; Martinus, M.; Fong, K.; Aridati, I.; Thao, P.T.P.; Chee, D. The State of Southeast Asia: 2024 Survey Report; ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute: Singapore, 2024; ISBN 27375102. Available online: https://www.iseas.edu.sg/centres/asean-studies-centre/state-of-southeast-asia-survey/the-state-of-southeast-asia-2024-survey-report/ (accessed on 30 March 2025).
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.